Posted by JM on November 17, 1998 at 22:42:24:
In Reply to: Re: Tutorial Preview posted by Nightmare on November 17, 1998 at 22:13:05:
: : That works, and almost makes sense ;), but it can't do odd numbers,
: True, but why would you need an odd number of sides? With a few exceptions, it would be almost the most useless shape there is.
: : and you need the equalateral triangle to begin with, which you can get using my technique. ;)
: You don't need an equilatteral triangle, you can use a square if you want. Yes, your method is a little more versatile, but my method is a great shortcut for the shapes you make most often (8, 12, & 16 sides). Those are about the only perfect polygons I ever make, and this way is a lot easier.
: Nightmare
I kindas like decagons and pentagons myself. ;) Infact, I think i shall make a pentagon level!