Posted by Nightmare on November 17, 1998 at 22:13:05:
In Reply to: Re: Tutorial Preview posted by JM on November 17, 1998 at 19:17:09:
: That works, and almost makes sense ;), but it can't do odd numbers,
True, but why would you need an odd number of sides? With a few exceptions, it would be almost the most useless shape there is.
: and you need the equalateral triangle to begin with, which you can get using my technique. ;)
You don't need an equilatteral triangle, you can use a square if you want. Yes, your method is a little more versatile, but my method is a great shortcut for the shapes you make most often (8, 12, & 16 sides). Those are about the only perfect polygons I ever make, and this way is a lot easier.
Nightmare